A small piece on the topic of European banking union, initially posted on my Sulia account.
It is increasingly widely acknowledged that a European banking union is essential to ensure the long term health of the eurozone and its banks.
Negotiations to this end will continue ahead of a meeting at the beginning of December in Brussels, in which member states are to agree on a banking union of sorts.
As is widely reported, much of the early stage discourse comes from states jostling for the best room for manoeuvre in regards to extent to which the European Central Bank would infringe over national central bank sovereignty; Germany for example seek to narrow the influence the ECB would have over its own banking system and that the size of its banking sector be matched by its influence over ECB directives.
Countries such as Denmark and Poland have sought to agree safeguards against decisions made by the solely single-currency ECB top committee. Britain on the other hand hopes to win strategic victories to ensure it doesn't remain too far on the euro zone's periphery; much debate over the summer regarded a 'two-speed Europe' in which the UK would potentially operate in a lower gear of influence as other states pressed onward for European integration.
In this, the problem of European banking union lies. States are wary of having their sovereignty infringed upon; yet increasingly economists are worried that the sovereignty of states with poor banking practices are holding back European recovery.
The numbers, however, according to a 'The Economist' source, are 'simply too big' to pursue a single deposit guarantee in which resources would be pooled in an ECB fund. Creditor countries are unlikely to be willing to set aside the sum it would take to create an insurance that would satisfy market confidence. It seems in this climate there is too much to lose, only uncertainties to gain.
Therein lies the factor which is likely to ultimately determine the success or failure of a banking union. Whilst countries scramble for safeguards, they are essentially negotiating to limit the power of the ECB to provide an effective regulatory and supervisory function over Europe's ailing banking sectors.
As 'The Economist' succinctly notes: 'Shortcuts that fudge questions of accountability and dodge a genuine pooling of risk make matters even worse.'
Negotiations to this end will continue ahead of a meeting at the beginning of December in Brussels, in which member states are to agree on a banking union of sorts.
As is widely reported, much of the early stage discourse comes from states jostling for the best room for manoeuvre in regards to extent to which the European Central Bank would infringe over national central bank sovereignty; Germany for example seek to narrow the influence the ECB would have over its own banking system and that the size of its banking sector be matched by its influence over ECB directives.
Countries such as Denmark and Poland have sought to agree safeguards against decisions made by the solely single-currency ECB top committee. Britain on the other hand hopes to win strategic victories to ensure it doesn't remain too far on the euro zone's periphery; much debate over the summer regarded a 'two-speed Europe' in which the UK would potentially operate in a lower gear of influence as other states pressed onward for European integration.
In this, the problem of European banking union lies. States are wary of having their sovereignty infringed upon; yet increasingly economists are worried that the sovereignty of states with poor banking practices are holding back European recovery.
The numbers, however, according to a 'The Economist' source, are 'simply too big' to pursue a single deposit guarantee in which resources would be pooled in an ECB fund. Creditor countries are unlikely to be willing to set aside the sum it would take to create an insurance that would satisfy market confidence. It seems in this climate there is too much to lose, only uncertainties to gain.
Therein lies the factor which is likely to ultimately determine the success or failure of a banking union. Whilst countries scramble for safeguards, they are essentially negotiating to limit the power of the ECB to provide an effective regulatory and supervisory function over Europe's ailing banking sectors.
As 'The Economist' succinctly notes: 'Shortcuts that fudge questions of accountability and dodge a genuine pooling of risk make matters even worse.'
- Michael John Cass @michaeljohncass